1. Did you know that the Judge is not the Court?
One must learn the following paradox; whereas, even though the Court is always where the Judge sits down, the Judge is NOT the "Court". In addition, the Judge is required to uphold the Judicial Machinery of the Court; that is, the Judge's sworn duty is defined by the Court.
2. Did you know the Court is an unbiased, but methodical "creature" which is governed by the Rule of Law? That is:
All of which:
The Court can ONLY be effective, fair and "just" if it is allowed to function as these laws proscribe.
3. Did you know that, in America, the Fundamental Laws of the Land is neither changeable nor repealable?
This is probably only true today in the re-inhabited republic State of Texas and will only remain so if We the People can hold on to it.
“The idea that the government is superior to Fundamental Law, and such Law is changeable and repealable, has only been maintained during the course of governmental tyranny or usurpation. The doctrine is not sound, nor was it part of the English Constitution. The truth of the supremacy of the Law of the Land over government was to be resolved and acknowledged not in England, but in America.'
'The conflict over Life, Liberty and Property came to a showdown with the oppressive acts that King George III and Parliament brought upon the American colonies. It was with this episode in history that the protection of Life, Liberty and Property by Due Process of Law was firmly and fully established. It was here that the Law of the Land was upheld supreme over acts of government.” from Life, Liberty and Property, subtitle: The Scope and Nature of our Fundamental Rights as Secured by and Recognized under DUE PROCESS AND THE LAW OF THE LAND, by Charles A. Wiseman, page 37
Since the legislative history of what happened in Utah on November 14, 2010, by the newly re-inhabited Republic of the united States has been kept secret from the people, it is not certain of whether an attempt to remove the supremacy of the People's Law of the Land over government was attempted. Since actions speak louder than words it is the opinion of this writer that this was what happened there; albeit through ignorance of the Law of the Land.
4. Did you know that any Judge who does not follow the above rule of law is violating his or her oath of office?
The sad fact is that in MOST Courts across the country, from Federal Courts down to local District courts, there are judges who are violating their oath of office and are NOT properly following the rules in question 2’s answer, (as most attorney's do NOT as well, and are usually grossly ignorant of the rules and both judges and attorneys are playing a revised legal game with their own created rules) and THIS is a Fraud upon the Court, immediately removing jurisdiction from that Court, and vitiates (makes ineffective - invalidates) every decision from that point on.
5. Did you know a Judge that violates his or her oath of office is under a mandatory, non-discretionary duty to recuse himself or herself from the case?
Another sad thing is that any judge who violates his or her oath of office and is the under mandatory, non-discretionary duty to recuse himself or herself from the case, rarely does so. It usually only happens when someone can force them to do so with the evidence of violations of procedure and threat of losing half their pensions for life which is what can take place. In any case, it is illegal, and EVERY case which has had fraud involved can be re-opened AT ANY TIME, because there is no statutes of limitations on fraud.